Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tessellation Exploration: The Basics"

From EscherMath
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
(Proposal to rename the page.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is nice.
+
This is nice. I saw you re-used some of the other pictures, and you've got "define" going.
 
I changed the regular tessellation pictures to the .svg files from the [[Tessellations by Polygons]] page.
 
I changed the regular tessellation pictures to the .svg files from the [[Tessellations by Polygons]] page.
 +
 
What would you think of renaming this to "Tessellation by Polygons Exploration"?  It's more descriptive and fits better with the Exploration naming scheme.
 
What would you think of renaming this to "Tessellation by Polygons Exploration"?  It's more descriptive and fits better with the Exploration naming scheme.
 +
 +
[[User:Bryan|Bryan]] 00:10, 19 May 2007 (CDT)
 +
 +
I deleted "convex" from the description of the polygons in a regular tessellation, since a regular polygon must be convex.  I also put "congruent" in a different portion of the definition, since it is a false parallelism to include it with convex (since "congruent" is a relation between two polygons, not a modifier of a single polygon).
 +
 +
[[User:Steve|Steve]] 19:22, 4 September 2007 (CDT)
 +
 +
I'd still like to rename this, either to my suggestion above or Basic Tessellations Exploration.  If there's no objections soon, I'm going to go ahead.
 +
 +
[[User:Bryan|Bryan]] 11:36, 6 February 2009 (CST)

Latest revision as of 11:36, 6 February 2009

This is nice. I saw you re-used some of the other pictures, and you've got "define" going. I changed the regular tessellation pictures to the .svg files from the Tessellations by Polygons page.

What would you think of renaming this to "Tessellation by Polygons Exploration"? It's more descriptive and fits better with the Exploration naming scheme.

Bryan 00:10, 19 May 2007 (CDT)

I deleted "convex" from the description of the polygons in a regular tessellation, since a regular polygon must be convex. I also put "congruent" in a different portion of the definition, since it is a false parallelism to include it with convex (since "congruent" is a relation between two polygons, not a modifier of a single polygon).

Steve 19:22, 4 September 2007 (CDT)

I'd still like to rename this, either to my suggestion above or Basic Tessellations Exploration. If there's no objections soon, I'm going to go ahead.

Bryan 11:36, 6 February 2009 (CST)